EVE Search - Sticky:Dev Blog: CSM 9 Results!

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

Sticky:Dev Blog: CSM 9 Results!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 9 post(s)
Two step Aperture Harmonics No Holes Barred 4630	Posted - 2014.05.09 15:44:00 - [1] - Quote This blog is useless without the ballot file (I understand the CSM is on the case though!) CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
Two step Aperture Harmonics No Holes Barred 4630	Posted - 2014.05.09 16:29:00 - [2] - Quote Edited my early post with my prelim analysis: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4572019#post4572019 CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
Two step Aperture Harmonics No Holes Barred 4631	Posted - 2014.05.09 16:55:00 - [3] - Quote Weaselior wrote: Two step wrote: This blog is useless without the ballot file (I understand the CSM is on the case though!) Edit: (after getting the ballot file) Here is my analysis that I ran last time around. Key: Top Votes - # of votes with all the people at the top Complete Votes - # of votes with all the people in the ballot somewhere Partial Votes - # of votes with at least 2 of the people in the ballot somewhere that is not a top or complete vote Solo Votes - # of votes that had just one person listed in the group ... Bloc - Provi (corebloodbrothers) Top Votes 2944 (9% of votes) Complete Votes 2945 (9% of votes) Partial Votes 0 Solo Votes 1736 Total Votes 7625 (24% of votes) your total here makes no sense: each solo vote is also a top vote and a complete vote, each complete vote is a top vote (and those numbers should be the same I don't understand why they're off by one) you can't just total all categories like this as you'll have some overlaps Yeah, apparently my script has some bugs with 1 person blocs, I should probably just not include them. Figuring out an order is always a little odd with STV, but here is what you get when you run the election for 1 seat, then 2, then 3, etc. This time around, progod would make a 5 person council, but not a 6 person council, where mynnna and corebloodbrothers displace him. Ali Aras Sion Kumitomo Steve Ronuken Sugar Kyle progodlegend (tie?) mynnna (tie?) corebloodbrothers corbexx Matias Otero Mike Azariah Mangala Solaris DJ FunkyBacon Xander Phoena Major JSilva CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
Two step Aperture Harmonics No Holes Barred 4631	Posted - 2014.05.09 17:10:00 - [4] - Quote Also, the very last spot was quite close. It was down to Mangala, Major JSilva and Asayanami Dei, and Asay lost by 79 votes. CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
Two step Aperture Harmonics No Holes Barred 4631	Posted - 2014.05.09 17:54:00 - [5] - Quote If those 1736 Provi voters literally had no opinion/the same opinion on anyone else running for the CSM, their votes were fine. Of course, that is total nonsense, and if they were actually thinking about things they would have realized that folks like Ali Aras or perhaps Mike Azariah or someone actually would represent their playstyles better than Xenuria and filled in their ballots. Of course then said uninformed voters show up in the thread and act all proud about being uninformed, so shine on you crazy diamonds. CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
Two step Aperture Harmonics No Holes Barred 4636	Posted - 2014.05.09 19:07:00 - [6] - Quote Freelancer117 wrote: Eligible voters have cast 31,294 votes for the CSM9, for CSM8 this number was 49,702 votes cast by eligible voters, and for CSM7 that was 59,109 votes cast by eligible voters. Seems like the logical conclusion is that CSM 7 was the best CSM, and everything since then has been downhill. Hmm, which CSM was the last one I was on again? CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
Two step Aperture Harmonics No Holes Barred 4638	Posted - 2014.05.09 19:32:00 - [7] - Quote I agree that the lower voter turnout is a very big issue. Even goon/CFC turnout is down this year, with 700 fewer people voting their ballot. Does anyone think the CFC is smaller than they were last time around? I think there are a couple of main issues: 1) This election was messed up. It was greatly delayed and poorly publicized. No mass evemail to all players, no in game popup, no devs with blue text in jita local telling folks to vote. 2) Less exciting (and excited!) candidates. No real big names, except for a few incumbents. No attempts to buy giant banners on the various eve news sites. Even twitter was relatively quiet this time around, especially after the first day or two of the election. Part of this is because CCP isn't (currently) screwing up too badly. 3) Even if you don't buy into the tinfoil hat brigade up above, EVE isn't growing like it used to. If CCP did release sub numbers, they would probably be about the same as they have been for the last year or so. No new players means less people asking older players "What is the CSM?". CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
Two step Aperture Harmonics No Holes Barred 4644	Posted - 2014.05.12 15:49:00 - [8] - Quote TheSmokingHertog wrote: Is there a statistic of how many of fanfest attending accounts did vote? I ask this question every year to most of the people I talk to. My estimate is about 60% or so of FF attendees vote. CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
Two step Aperture Harmonics No Holes Barred 4644	Posted - 2014.05.12 15:58:00 - [9] - Quote CCP Leeloo wrote: Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: I realize this will be met with stony silence, but I will ask for posterity. Why, for what appears to be the first time, was data not released by CCP that is sufficient to calculate the TQ subscription base. I thought that answer to this question is obvious. Because this blog has been released to provide information regarding the CSM9 elections, not regarding the amount of subscriptions on TQ. I understand that, but isn't it important to measure and report voter turnout %? Perhaps by giving general guidance, within a 5% range? CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.